“The historical novel is, for me, condemned,” he wrote to Sarah Orne Jewett in 1901. “You may multiply the little facts that can be got from pictures and documents, relics and prints, as much as you like — the real thing is almost impossible to do, and in its essence the whole effect is as nought: I mean the invention, the representation of the old consciousness, the soul, the sense, the horizon, the vision of individuals in whose minds half the things that make ours, that make the modern world, were nonexistent.” -Geraldine Brooks on Henry James
Henry James further commented on writing about the past to Sara Jewett saying “…Any attempt to write about a time more than 50 years removed from one’s own was worthless and should not even be attempted.”
Do you agree or disagree with Henry James that the past is impossible to represent?
I disagree with Henry James statement that the past is impossible to represent in writing. I understand what he’s saying but he’s still wrong. It is harder to represent the past when it is more than fifty years removed from your own, but it is not impossible. It is harder because you won’t normally find living witnesses and documentations maybe lost or tampered with. Also it may be harder because you your self didn’t live in that past to which you are writing.
One can represent the past very efficiently in writing. The main way for a writer to represent the past is to put aside the technological and modern differences and focus on human emotion and human nature. It doesn’t matter that we speak differently now or that we don’t live in log cabins and wear wool garments every day. What matters is the predictability of mankind. The specific situations may be different but the reactions are going to be the same. As a species we haven’t evolved much at all. Yes, our technologies have improved and we’ve found better ways to survive but if you look back through history you’ll notice that no matter how civilized we may become we still have the same human instincts. We have the same fears, curiosity, wants, hopes, and dreams.
Our intellect is no greater either. People seem to think that just because these people lived hundreds of years ago that they must not be as smart or civilized as we are; that we as a people now must be completely different from those before us. What about Socrates, Einstein, Shakespeare, Archimedes, the Wright brothers, Humphrey Davey? I don’t believe we have anyone in our time with their intellect, their ability to see beyond the ‘norm’ and the accepted. There’s also the example of the Great Pyramids and Easter Island. We can’t even figure out how these buildings were made. You also have to look at the aqueducts in Rome and realize that they weren’t even the ones who invented it. It was actually the Assyrians in 691 B.C.
So going back to whether or not a writer can represent the past efficiently is no question. Just imagine yourself in that era. To get in touch with the past all you have to do is a little role playing. For example say you want to know what it felt like to live in the 1600’s, just go to Williamsburg or Jamestown where they have exact replications of that period. Say you want to know what it feels like to have to make a living by farming like so many of our ancestors did, just go to some small rural town and you’ll find out. Or maybe you want to know what it is like to live in a village, just go to South America or Africa. You can even reenact being an Indian on America’s reservations. It is easy to escape the modern world because the modern world only occurs in clusters. There are so many places around the world where time has stood still and you won’t see much, if any, modern advancement.

Recent Comments